Monday, 13 May 2013

Editorial


Photo: www.guardian.co.uk 

Law is an outstanding innovation of human rationale for it always inspires and guides men in their deliberate efforts of development.  It is inextricably related to human society reflecting its mobility and greatness at every stage of human progress.

Sovereignty and liberty are the invaluable gifts that law has given to civilized man. This instilled both admiration and fear in them. Law as a multidimensional concept emerged from natural law and natural justice; traversing criminal and civil systems it entered the realms of moral law. Natural law enables him to observe nature from a scientific point of view while the criminal and civil dimension makes him better equipped for constructing modern society. And moral law provides him a well cultured human society. It is a truism that the harmonious blend of these three dimensions of law is a prerequisite for the holistic development of the human community.

At the same time, certain restrictions are inevitable in order to achieve such a human community. First and foremost, man needs to be controlled by rules and regulations. But this is still a castle in the air. It is an indisputable fact that the fear of police and public opinion rather than self-control and truthfulness breeds morality.  But the existence and influence of law can facilitate such an environment of prosperity and development in human communities. Secondly, man must have the courage and the mind set to willingly accept the recognition of his own conscience rather than passive submission to mere rules and regulations. The moment he discerns these noble legal views man becomes a morally and legally refined personality.

Human beings are the highest products of social evolution. Men follow the laws that they themselves formulate. Law students are the budding interpreters and practitioners of law. Interpretation of law is not a mere technical task but a social duty and advocates are doing social service. This raises two fundamental questions:  who is the right person to interpret the law? Is it legal interpretation or legal practice that strengthens an advocate? The idea of mere legal interpreter or legal practitioner evokes nothing but a vacuum. It can be equated with the plight of a person who is insensitive to the lives around him. When the traditional values face challenges and are substituted with modern values, mechanical interpretation of law becomes a failure as social service.

For the perfection of such a society drastic changes should be made in the minds of those who practice and interpret law. They must be content with their self- recognition rather with external acceptance. They must be loyal to laws and also exercise self- control. Those people who obtain a degree in law must internalize the essence of law instead of just accumulating legal knowledge. Those people who cannot attain this mentality are harmful to society even if they are law makers, law interpreters or law practitioners. Undoubtedly, the lack of such a frame of mind is the curse of modern society. 







(Dr. P.G Balachandran Pillai is a Professor at Government Law College and also acts as the Editorial Advisory Board Chairman)







Wednesday, 24 April 2013

Brief remembrance about one of the rarest of the rare Judges of excellence

Justice. J.S Verma


By Justice V.R krishna Iyer

Jagdish Sharan Verma was one of the greatest Chief Justices of India.  He was more than a judge and will be remembered for a hundred great things in which he was involved.  He comes from Madhya Pradesh as a distinguished lawyer was elevated as Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh and also of the Rajasthan High Court.  He was responsible for the judicial promotion of a collegium which in my view was an institution of doubtful value.  I like him most not for his collegium judgments but for making a historic and creative contribution on enunciating principles of judicial good behaviour.  Whenever judicial good behaviour was under question the values formulated by J.S. Verma were the hallmark authoritatively ever lay down.  He stood for judicial accountability and headed many Commissions on divergent aspects of judicial conduct and public life.  Beyond his judicial career Justice J.S. Verma’s reports on other dimensions of enquiry where he was chosen to be Chairman makes this great judge one of the finest members of the Indian judiciary.  I have had occasion to meet him quite often and admired him for his integrity fearless and frank opinions and for above all for formulation of what good judicial behaviour should be.  In my humble view Justice Verma excelled most judges who sat on the Supreme Court in being a model judge ever ready to serve public causes whenever required by the Republic of India.  Great J.S. Verma, I salute you though posthumously for your sublime achievements throughout your marvellous career on the Supreme Court Bench.


(V.R krishna Iyer, eminent jurist, is a former Judge of the Supreme Court of India)

Tuesday, 9 April 2013

Same Sex Marriages- An unnatural bizarre operation.


Photo: www.guardian.co.uk


By
V.R Krishna Iyer               

 Man weds woman in response to the sex urge.  This dual sex operation is inevitable if creation into communities and the formation of societies is nature’s objective.  Man is never single but a collective.  This process is rendered possible by Nature creating sex and the operation of male and female sexes.  They unite through appropriating male and female organs and this is matrimony.  The female womb contains the female egg which is fertilized by the male semen.    This fertilization in the womb gives birth to life—a mystery of Nature and grows into a full human being and gives birth to a living being.  This is the natural method of reproduction by the two sexes and makes this operation for a population, from insects, animals, birds and humans organized and developed into society.  The male sex and its opposite the female are conditions absolutely necessary to successful reproduction.  The same sex cannot produce a new being.  So is the biological mission and chemistry of creation.  Nature has invented the sex appeal a powerful appetite and attraction.  Sans sex there is no craze for union, no womb with egg, no semen, no fertilization, no babe, no birth, no parents, no community and no society.  In the absence of these social processes there cannot be social progress.  If humanity is to rise above animal existence and establish a civilization we require rival sexes, rival communities and finally the realization of the spiritual inner man.  The forces of progress have organized the system of marriage so that orderly development may be possible as against sexual violence.  Since 2000, several countries and some other jurisdictions have legalized the same-sex marriage.  It is unnatural though.  Cohabitation is the order of nature although in early Rome same sex-marriages did exist as a scarce exception.
               
In modern cultures same sex marriages are a rarity and the law frowns on that practice.  Two opposite sexes are the rule and deeply rooted in the psychological instinct of humanity and sub-human species.  The same sex is unnatural and hardly merits civilized debate or discuss.  The dual sex of male and female without which reproduction is not possible is the biological methodology of creation of communities and cultures.  A social study of matrimony as spelt out in the website gives us a picture of civilized society.
People marry for many reasons, including: legal, social, libidinal, emotional, financial, spiritual, and religious. Marriages can be performed in a secular civil ceremony or in a religious setting. The act of marriage usually creates normative or legal obligations between the individuals involved. Some cultures allow the dissolution of marriage through divorce or annulment. Polygamous marriages may also occur in spite of national laws.
Marriage can be recognized by a state, an organization, a religious authority, a tribal group, a local community or peers. It is often viewed as a contract. Civil marriage is the legal concept of marriage as a governmental institution irrespective of religious affiliation, in accordance with marriage laws of the jurisdiction.



(V.R Krishna Iyer, eminent jurist, is a former Judge of the Supreme Court of India)

Saturday, 23 March 2013

'Italy cannot claim sovereign immunity'

Massimiliano Latorre, center and Salvatore Girone, right,
coming out of Central Prison, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Photo: Associated Press

The Killing of two Indian Fishermen off Kerala Coast has even led to a legal-diplomatic war between Republic of India and Republic of Italy. Both the countries contents jurisdiction to try this case. This case climbed the stairs of Supreme Court at least four times. The ‘Note Verbale’ by Italian Government and subsequent Supreme Court order restraining Italian Ambassador from leaving out of India and possibility of contempt proceedings again led to Diplomatic war between both countries.

Special Public Prosecutor for Enrica Lexi Case at Kollam Sessions Court, Shri. G Mohan Raj exclusively spoke to Nebil Nizar. Given below is the excerpt from the conversation.

Adv. G Mohan Raj

1- The Supreme Court has ruled that India has jurisdiction in this case, but not Kerala. How do you react?

 Mohan Raj:
I think even Kerala Courts has jurisdiction. As long as Indian Constitution, Indian Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code extends to the state of Kerala, and jurisdiction of India is extended using Maritime Zones act, Kerala is having jurisdiction.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court has ruled that Kerala is having jurisdiction up to 12 nautical miles and India is having Jurisdiction up to 200 nautical miles. As for the time being, that is the Law of the land.


2- The Complainant in this case was Kerala Police. Now you have been stripped of your rights. What can you do?

Mohan Raj: Criminal offence is an offence against the state. In Larger perspective we can say that state can be nation itself. When Jurisdiction of Kerala state is taken away, Jurisdiction will go back to Central Government. For the reason that Kerala Police initially registered the case and thereafter it was found that Kerala is having no jurisdiction, the initiation of criminal proceedings will not abate.


3- Supreme Court said that Registration of FIR is correct, Investigation is correct, but, you do not have Jurisdiction. Don’t you feel this is strange?

Mohan Raj: That is the anomaly. When it is said by the Apex Court, we have no option other than to follow it.


4- How did you begin this case?

Mohan Raj: First, we searched for Notification under The Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 (the Maritime Zones Act, for short). Fortunately we could find a 1981 Notification by Central Government. In the notification it was said that Indian Penal Code was extended up to 200 nautical miles. Then we were sure that we had Jurisdiction to investigate this case.
As far as criminal law is concerned, if nothing prohibits the initiation of proceedings, then it can be. As on the date of registration of FIR, there was nothing prohibiting Kerala Police from conducting an Investigation. So, Federal state initiated action. FIR was registered, seizure was made.


5- The Accused(s) in this case are members of armed forces of a sovereign country in friendly relations with India. Are they entitled to Sovereign Immunity?

Mohan Raj: For getting the benefit of sovereign immunity, you should be exercising a sovereign function. Here, in this case, Investigating Officer could rightly find out that they were engaged for giving private security to a private ship. Italian Military was getting paid for that.  It was a paid service. Sovereign Immunity can be claimed only when the Marines acted for Italian Government. The Marines did not fire for the safety of Italy.


6- There is a Prisoner Exchange Agreement between India and Italy. Are you afraid that the Marines would shrug off the clutches of Indian Law?

Mohan Raj: That is by virtue of The Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003. Recently India and Italy has signed an agreement. They might be foreseeing a conviction. If they are convicted, they might ask Union Government to repatriate them to Italy.


7- Media reports quote Italian authorities saying that India has agreed in writing that the accused (s) will not be given Capital punishment. How do you react to this?

Mohan Raj: It is premature to comment about that. We cannot say the outcome of the trial. First of all they must be found guilty. Then mitigation circumstances have to be considered. Then we have to consider whether it is a rarest of the rare case. Then only that issue arises.


*
Special thanks to Shri. Reju Prasad and Smt. Garima Tiwari

Friday, 22 March 2013

Law or India?





By Justice V.R Krishna Iyer

India was the greatest colony of the British Empire.  Indian culture was one of the most glorious ever as pointed out by Max Muller.  But this glory notwithstanding India suffered slavery under the British Empire.  A.O. Hume a Britisher was humiliated by this servitude of India and he was among the foremost who instigated India’s right for its freedom.  There were other great Indians like Bala Gangadhar Tilak who joined him.  The Indian freedom movement gained mass support even in England. Indian freedom became a powerful movement.  Annie Besant a great orator was a leader of the Satyagraha movement in India.  So powerful was this great movement that the House of Commons granted Indian independence by legislation.  On the 15th of August 1947 India declared its freedom in a historic speech by Jawaharlal Nehru who was the President of the National Congress.  That speech not very long was a rare performance which I reproduce here:
Long years ago, we made a tryst with destiny, and now the time comes when we shall redeem our pledge, not wholly or in full measure, but very substantially. At the stroke of the midnight hour, when the world sleeps, India will awake to life and freedom. A moment comes, which comes but rarely in history, when we step out from the old to the new, when an age ends, and when the soul of a nation, long suppressed, finds utterance. It is fitting that at this solemn moment we take the pledge of dedication to the service of India and her people and to the still larger cause of humanity.

At the dawn of history India started on her unending quest, and trackless centuries are filled with her striving and the grandeur of her successes, and her failures. Through good and ill fortune alike she has never lost sight of that quest or forgotten the ideals which gave her strength. We end today a period of ill fortune and India discovers herself again. The achievement we celebrate today is but a step, an opening of opportunity, to the greater triumphs and achievements that await us. Are we brave enough and wise enough to grasp this opportunity and accept the challenge of the future?

Freedom and power bring responsibility. The responsibility rests upon this Assembly, a sovereign body representing the sovereign people of India. Before the birth of freedom, we have endured all the pains of labour and our hearts are heavy with the memory of this sorrow. Some of those pains continue even now. Nevertheless, the past is over and it is the future that beckons to us now. That future is not one of ease or resting but of incessant striving so that we might fulfill the pledges we have so often taken and the One we shall take today. The service of lndia means the service of the millions who suffer. It means the ending of poverty and ignorance and disease and inequality of opportunity. The ambition of the greatest man of our generation has been to wipe every tear from every eye. That may be beyond us but as long as there are tears and suffering, so long our work will not be over.

And so we have to labour and to work and work hard to give reality to our dreams. Those dreams are for India, but they are also for the world, for all the nations and peoples are too closely knit together today for anyone of them to imagine that it can live apart. Peace has been said to be indivisible; so is freedom, so is prosperity now, and so also is disaster in this one world that can no longer be split into isolated fragments. To the people of India, whose representatives we are, we appeal to join us' with faith and confidence in this great adventure. This is no time for petty and destructive criticism, no time for ill-will or blaming others. We have to build the noble mansion of free India where all her children may dwell.


Till then India was a creature of British law and Indian freedom was a part of British jurisprudence.  Indian law was governed by British power who ruled our country through a Viceroy.  Law India had to be eliminated. But from the 15th of August 1947 when the declaration of Indian independence was made, India was a pre-Republic whose fate was decided by a Constituent Assembly.  This Assembly made India a Socialist, Democratic Republic.  Its entire governance was controlled by an original constitution framed by its own Constituent Assembly.  Its Constitution was the longest and noblest and gave to the people of India a Preamble one of the best in the world.  This Preamble was a proud paramount deed.  This Constitution made Bharat one of the most powerful nations of the Common Wealth.  It had a powerful defense as was demonstrated in World War-I and later in the greatest war the world has seen in the World War-II.

The great issue before the nation was independence or Indian nationality.  In short, the people of India who gave to themselves a Constitution of its own wanted the rule of law govern a great democracy.  Not merely law they also wanted independence.  In short, We, the People of India decided to have the rule of law rather the Socialist Democratic Republic of India and no longer any trace of imperialism but swaraj as contemplated by the resolution passed by the National Congress during its struggle for freedom.

There were feudal cultures in India with over 600 princes governing various territories of their own. While so foreigners came into India.  The Portuguese Vasco De Gama came to Calicut and established the first piece of foreign territory and with this began foreign rule in India.  Gradually other foreign western countries landed in India and made us subordinate to western forces.  Eventually the British dominated India and made this great country its colony.  As started earlier the world faced two world wars and at the end of which a new world emerged.  The UNO came into existence with human rights as a great factor in civilization. The American forces which were after the British waged a civil war which begin with Boston Tea Party and ended with the American Declaration of Independence making Washington the most powerful Nation in the world.  Thus the new world was governed by American Republic, the largest ever world has seen. In this new world India had a great place.  From feudalism the world saw agriculture which in turn was overcome by industrial civilization.  Today the world is largely industrial although India continues to be agricultural.  India lives in its villages largely agricultural. But industrial civilization has taken over with the result the great Mahatma the Father of the Nation made India essentially non industrial. The soul of India is even  today agricultural and the people lives in villages.  Such is our nation but it stand by the rule of law and democracy.  Each adult citizen having franchise today.  India is a democracy and a socialist secular democratic Republic.  What we have gained is the rule of law. No longer under princess but under the people. Bharat is now a people’s democracy.

This grand Republic in this excellence is best understood by its noble Preamble which runs thus:
WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens:
JUSTICE, social, economic and political;
LIBERTY, of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity;
and to promote among them all
FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation.
This grand Preamble sums up the essentials of the anatomy of our Constitution.  In essence it is socialist which means that the imperial capitalist rule of law must quit and the common man not the wealthier class will have the governance of the nation.  The conscience of the Constitution lies in Part III and IV.  The great human rights enshrined in Part-III are perhaps the glory of our Constitution.  The Directive Principles of State policy imparts a public dimension to the values of the Constitution.  That is why under our Constitution Public Interest Litigation played so key a role that whenever there is a violation either by the executive or by the legislature of the public values of Part-III and IV it is open to any citizen to move the higher courts and seek a writ to defend his rights and the ruling of the High Court is a great protection of the citizens under Article 141 and 32 of the Constitution.  As we read through the entire Constitution what looms large is the anxiety of the framers to use the Constitution for the weaker sections of the Indian community.  It is not merely a materialist document but gives importance to spiritual and moral value as well.  Article 47 is all against alcoholism and for the have-nots.  This is the quintessence of socialism nor is our Constitution against spiritual value.  Secularism as declared in the Constitution secularism, creedal freedom, integrity, fraternity and equality of faith.  Even linguistically people have freedom of language and cultural development.  In short, a multi-dimensional progressiveness is stridently writ large in the various schedules of the Constitution.  But above all, national unity is paramount and legality is equally important.  We have the best Constitution but it works well and makes the country unite so long as the operators of the paramount deed work it well.  The Constitution is how it operates vis a vis the little Indian as he exercises his vote freely and in fulfilment of the Preamble.   Justice above all is the prominent feature of our LAW.  International peace and comity is a prominent feature of our paramount deed.

The will of the majority of the people of India decides who wheels the sovereign power.  The people in their majority articulate their voice through the General Elections periodically held where every little Indian through his little mark makes his will speak on paper which our final court tells the world who will command the sovereign power of India that is Bharat.
’the little man, walking into a little booth, with a little pencil, making a little cross on a little bit of paper—no amount of rhetoric or voluminous discussion can possibly diminish the overwhelming importance of the point.‘  

India finds its finest expression of humanity and divinity blended in a humane unity not through the wonder of verbalism but through the determination of its people through a periodic General Election not through the wealth of party or of any personality or family but through the numbers of adult Indians in a free and fair election independently held with the ultimate validity ruled by the Supreme Court which enjoys sovereign power under the Constitution.

As earlier elaborated the twin paramount commitments of the Constitution Indian humanity are (A) Law India by which I mean the country is committed to the rule of law as finally upheld by the Supreme Court of India and (B) Its non-negotiable subordination to swaraj as accepted by the nation as a whole and never belonging to a family or personality.  The rule of law is controlled by an absolutely independent judiciary supported by a Bar utterly subject to integrity.  A humane justice and a Bar which surrenders to have except the rule of law the best description of this concept is given by Justice Felix Frankfurter thus:
No one can be a truly competent lawyer unless he is a cultivated man.  If I were you, I would forget all about any technical preparation for the law.  The best way to prepare for the law is come to the study of the law as a well-read person.  Thus alone can one acquire the capacity to use the English language on paper and in speech and with the habits of clear thinking which only a truly liberal education can give.  No less important for a lawyer is the cultivation of the imaginative faculties by reading poetry, seeing great paintings, in the original or in easily available reproductions, and listening to great music.  Stock your mind with a deposit of much good reading, and widen and deepen your feelings by experiencing vicariously as much as possible the wonderful mysteries of the universe, and forget all about your future career.






Thursday, 14 March 2013

'Women ought to join judiciary'

Chief Minister Oomen Chandy lighting the lamp in the presence of
MLA K Muraleedharan, Education Minister Abdu Rabb and Principal S Usha. Photo: Navya Frederick Pereira



By Nebil Nizar


Thiruvananthapuram: Chief Minister Oomen Chandy  after laying the foundation stone of new Research Block at Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram urged Girls students to come forward and join the Judiciary.

Chief Minister traveled down the memory lane and remembered that majority of the students during his student days at Government Law College Ernakulam were boys. He said, I am now happy to see that now girls constitute the majority.

The New Research Complex also houses a new Auditorium Hall and a Canteen. Chief Minister expressed his wish to convert Old Highland Bunglow, which houses the Principal's chamber and a few classrooms as Heritage Block and requested the Principal to submit a memorandum on this regard.

The program dated 12th March 2013, was presided by K. Muraleedhran, local MLA and attended by Shri. Abdu Rabb, Minister for Education, Government of Kerala and Principal Smt. Usha.


myidnebil@gmail.com

GLC Ernakulam adjudged First.

Government Law College Ernakulam receiving
certificates and cash prize from Dr.T.M Thomas Isaac. Photo: Navya Frederick Pereira 

By Nebil Nizar


Thiruvananthapuram: Bhagyalekshmi R and Sanu S Malakeel from Government Law College Ernakulam came First in the First of its Kind in Kerala- 'Draft a Bill Competition' conducted by Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram, University of Kerala.

Second position was bagged by Annie Mampilly and Sangeeth K from School of Legal Studies, Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT).

Asit Behera and Aditi Tiwari from Hidayatullah National Law University (HNLU); Marina A Chaly and Sheba Rivy Simon from National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS) shared Second Runner up position.

The prices were given away by Former Kerala Finance Minister and Academic Prof. (Dr.) T.M Thomas Isaac at an International Seminar on Internal Migration, on 11th March 2013 at Olympia Chambers, Chandrashekaran Nair Stadium, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Surekha Srinivasan from Government Law College Mumbai served as Consultant for this Competition which was powered by this blog.


Sunday, 3 March 2013

Judge Advocate General (JAG)

Photo: www.ibnlive.in

By Adv. Kiran Lal


For every sector, whether it is private or public there is always a wing for legal support. Similarly for the defence also there is a separate legal branch which provides both legal advice to the higher formations and also conduct in service proceedings.

For Army it is called the Judge Advocate Generals Branch (JAG) and for Navy its called the Law Cadre. For Airforce there is no separate law branch but law qualified people are inducted into the Ground Duty Officers Branch.

For Entry into the Army and Navy the selection procedure starts with the filling of application in the prescribed format. Notifications are published in the following websites
For entry into the Airforce one has to clear the AFCAT exam conducted by the Air force.
Once a candidate is listed provisionally he will be called for a Service Selection Board Interview(SSB)

For selection for Army JAG the SSB interview is mainly conducted at Allahabad and Bhopal. For Navy its at Bhopal, Bangalore and Coimbatore.

For Airforce its at Mysore, Varanasi and Dehradun.



At the SSB
Candidates appearing at the SSB for the first time are provided with the travelling allowance of 3 Tier A.C

The SSB interview is spread over a duration of 4-5 days and up to 10 days  including the medicals.


ARRIVAL


1.      On Arrival the process of document verification will take place candidates are advised to carry the original documents of their Educational Qualification, 10th, 12th, certificates, mark sheets of all semesters, Age proof Certificate etc.



DAY 1
This day includes the initial screening or the stage one test. Only those candidates who are successful at the stage one test are allowed for the stage 2 test.
Stage 1 test
1.      Verbal Intelligence test
2.      NM – Verbal Intelligence test
3.      Picture Perception and Description test (PPDT)
Have a picture will be shown for 30 ss and the candidate has to write about the gender, age, mood of the character and the title. Then a story based on the picture which includes the past, present and future of the story with 4 – 5 minutes.
Offer this the candidates are made to sit in a group and will be made to describe the individual story and when this is over there will be a group discussion after the selection the results are declared those who are successful one retained. Few of the successful candidates will have to face the interview on the same day.
The interview is done by the President (Brigadior) or Dy. President (Col.) of the Board.

DAY 2
This day consist of the Psychological test
(I)                TAT (The matic apperception test)
 Here 11 – 12 different slides will be shown to the candidate. A story have to he written based on each slide with in a time of 2.5 mints last slide will be a blank slide and the story based on that should be some way related to the other slide.
(II)             WAT (Word Association test)
60 different words are shown one after other. The candidate has to unite a meaningful sentence with every word(time 15 seconds for viewing the word and writing the sentence)
(III)          SRT (Situation Reaction test)
60 different situations are given and the immediate reaction has to be written down (total time 30 mins)




DAY 3 and 4
GTO (Group Testing Officer’s Test)
1. Group Discussion  - 2 topics
2. G.P.E – Group Planning Exercise
Group planning exercise – a situation is given and it involves a difficult task – the candidate has to write down how he will complete the task then there will be a group discussion on that
3. Lecturette (3 minutes) for preparation and 3 min for speeching.
4. Progressive
Group task – task will be given and the difficulty level will go on increasing as we proceed this consist of clearing 3 obstacles
5. Half group task
Here the task will be almost similar but your group will be divided into half.
6. Command task
Here you will be the commands you can choose 2 members for your team for completing the task. This is done to assure your capability as a commander and the ability to convince the team.
Individual obstacle
This consists of clearing 10 obstacles within 3 minutes. Try to score maximum
Final group task
This is the last chance for a candidate to perform in the GTO’s, though it seems to be an unimportant part in reality this test also helps in scoring.


DAY 5
1. Technical officers speech to the candidates
2. Conference
3. Announcement of Results.




Important tips
1. Do little bit of practice for verbal test, TAT, WAT etc. so that you attain a good speed.
2. Refer 'The Hindu' Newspaper for Current affairs.
3. Conduct a preliminary medical checkup before the SSB
4. Make sure that you have got the required weight corresponding your height and age
5. Do jogging for at least 5km daily to be in good stamina.















(Kiran Lal is an Advocate practicing mainly Criminal side at High Court of Kerala and various Trial Courts in the state. He is a post graduate in Law from Mahatma Gandhi University, Kerala. He is also a strategic Expert. He may be contacted at <kiran_quilon@yahoo.co.in> / +91- 9037764902)

Tuesday, 26 February 2013

'End of an era'

Renvated and Converted Ladies Hostel
Photo: Navya Frederick Pereira

By Nebil Nizar

Thiruvananthapuram: Sun has finally set and Bastions are fallen. Law College men's hostel is finally converted as Ladies Hostel on Monday, 25th February 2012 at 11:00am.

Principal Prof. S Usha inaugurated the new renovated converted Hostel in the presence of faculty members and large number of students.

Prof. Usha inaugurating the new hostel.
Photo: Navya Frederick Pereira
Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram Student Blog learns that until now 60 lady students have secured admission in the new hostel. The  admission is limited to those who lives outside easily commutable distance of 40 km. Hostel Warden is Associate Professor Raghunathan. A temporary Matron is appointed from Kudumbasree Mission, Government of Kerala, until a permanent post is created by the state.

The Men's Hostel eviction notice saw widespread protests and Police action twice. The inmates also approached the High Court of Kerala praying for quashing of Government Order dated May 28 2012. Negotiations finally succeeded when the inmates agreed to be shifted to a separate Block at University Men's Hostel, Palayam.

The Hostel was originally inaugrated by then then President of India, Shri. Fakruddin Ali Ahammed on 13th of  April 1976. Sitting High Court Judge V. Chidambaresh, Home Minister of Kerala Thiruvanchoor Radhakrishnan, Oscar laureate Resul Pookutty; Former Ministers- G Sudhakran, T.M Jacob, N.K Premachandran; PC Vishnunath, MLA, includes the list of famous former residents.


myidnebil@gmail.com

Wednesday, 20 February 2013

LEGISLATION DRAFTING COMPETITION, 2013



GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE
MOOT COURT SOCIETY
BARTON HILL,VANCHIYOOR.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695035, KERALA







 LEGISLATION DRAFTING COMPETITION, 2013

The Moot Court Society of Government Law College is pleased to announce “The Legislation Drafting Competition, 2013”.

The topic for the Competition is:
“Migrant Workers (Control, Maintenance and Welfare) Bill, 2013”

Each legislation must be drafted by a maximum of two authors. The entries will be judged by a panel of eminent judges. It is recommended that the participants come up with innovative clauses at the same time being practical and non-Utopian. An example of a draft bill can be found on www.prsindia.org.

In the light of the current situation in our country and the urgent need to revisit and rethink on the conditions of migrant workers, we need a legislation to protect them. We need measures for their health, welfare and safety. An effective mechanism for registration and maintenance of migrant workers, especially in the unorganised sector.

Kindly confirm your participation for the same by 25th February 2013.
The entries must reach the Moot Court Society on or before 05th March, 2013 by 5:00 p.m. IST.







RULES FOR THE LEGISLATION DRAFTING COMPETITION, 2013

1. P
ARTICIPATION AND REGISTRATION
1.1. Each Legislation must be drafted by a maximum of two authors.
1.2. All entries must be in English.
1.3. Participants may be Students, Lawyers, Judges, Academicians or any other person interested in Law.

1.4. Participants may register by sending in their details (Name, Contact number and E-mail-ID) to myidnebil@gmail.com on or before 25th February, 2013.


2. P
RESENTATION
2.1. The Legislation must comprise of not less than 3000 words and not more than 5000 words including footnotes.
2.2. The Legislation should be typed on A4 size paper; font-size of the body of the text must be 12, font type: Times New Roman, 1.5. Spacing and one inch margins on each side.
2.3. Two hard-copies of the Legislation must be submitted in the Format specified to the Moot Court Society. Participants must also submit a soft-copy of the same to myidnebil@gmail.com in an MS-Word Read-Only Format.
2.4. Soft Copies must reach us by 5:00 p.m. on 05th March, 2013. Deadline for hardcopy is 07th March 2013, 05:00pm IST.


3. M
ARKING CRITERIA
3.1. Each Legislation will be marked on a total of 100 marks.
3.2. The following is the Criteria for marking each submission:
S. No
Marking Criteria
Marks Allocated
1.
Ingenuity of Ideas
30
2.
Structure of Legislation
20
3.
Issues Covered
40
4.
Language, Grammar & Style
10


TOTAL
100



4. M
ISCELLANEOUS

4.1. For the purpose of this competition, each article shall be the original work of the participant/s. Any article found to be a copied work from any other original work, would be disqualified.
4.2. If there arises any situation that is not contemplated in the Rules, the organizers decision on the same shall be final.
4.3. The organisers reserve the right to vary, alter, modify or repeal any of the above rules if so required and as they deem appropriate.
4.4. For any further queries, you may contact:
Prof. (Dr.) P.C John: +91 9446 41 8759
Nebil Nizar: + 91 9633 66 3063
Alternatively, you may e-mail your queries to: myidnebil@gmail.com.